De Broglie wavelength calculator

The wavelength of a particle from its mass and speed.

Inputs

De Broglie wavelength calculator

2 fields

Results are reference estimates. Verify the inputs before making important decisions.

Fill in the fields and the result will appear here automatically.

A particle’s de Broglie wavelength follows from its momentum: λ=h/p. This page uses the nonrelativistic approximation p=mv, with mass in units of 10⁻²⁷ kg and speed in km/s. It reports wavelength, momentum, kinetic energy and the fraction of light speed β. Near c the relativistic momentum is required; this page does not calculate it.

FAQ
5 questions
Freshness
formula-based

How it works

Formula and logic

λ = h/p, with h = 6.62607015·10⁻³⁴ J·s. Multiply the entered mass by 10⁻²⁷ kg and speed by 1000 m/s; p=mv; K=mv²/2; β=v/c. All results belong to the nonrelativistic approximation.

Example

An electron at 1000 km/s has a wavelength of 7.27·10⁻¹⁰ metres — under a nanometre.

Fields and units

  • Particle mass — ×10⁻²⁷ kg
  • Speed — km/s

How to use

  • — An electron mass of 9.1093837·10⁻³¹ kg corresponds to 0.00091093837 in the field. Convert kilograms first. Speed must be positive and below 299792.458 km/s; satisfying the field limits does not establish the accuracy of the nonrelativistic approximation.

Method and limitations

Calculation method
Formula and logic
Limitation
All results belong to the nonrelativistic approximation. Speed must be positive and below 299792.458 km/s; satisfying the field limits does not establish the accuracy of the nonrelativistic approximation.

FAQ

Why has a ball no noticeable wave?

For a 150 g ball at 30 m/s, p=4.5 kg·m/s and λ≈1.472·10⁻³⁴ m. This is about 19 orders below the 10⁻¹⁵ m scale; the comparison depends on the chosen nuclear size.

Why use mass units of 10⁻²⁷ kg?

Scaled units make the small mass convenient to enter as a decimal. A field value of 1 means 10⁻²⁷ kg. This is an input-unit convention, not a different physical mass.

What does wavelength say about a microscope?

A short wavelength enables high resolving power, but actual microscope resolution also depends on lenses, aberrations and the specimen. A wavelength alone does not predict instrument resolution.

Does the formula hold near light speed?

No: use p=γmv. For the same mass and speed the relativistic wavelength is shorter by a factor of γ. The displayed β is a diagnostic; a relativistic calculation mode is not implemented.

Why show a fraction of light speed rather than frequency?

β=v/c helps assess when p=mv is applicable. Matter-wave frequency relates to energy through E=hf; the particle speed and wavelength cannot simply be combined as f=v/λ for an ordinary wave.